Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 2 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
| 3 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 3 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 27% |
| 5 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
| 6 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 7% |
| 7 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 41% |
| 8 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 9 | ZHAO Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 10 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
| 11 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% |
| 12 | DENG David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 4% |
| 13 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% |
| 14 | MANDZY Theodor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 19% |
| 15 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
| 16 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | DHOKTE Neev | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 18 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
| 19 | OZAWA Taishi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | QIAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 21 | KIM Andrew | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | SUAREZ David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | YOON Junhyeok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% |
| 24 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 25 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 26 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 27 | LIM EUNSEONG | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 28 | LU Hansen | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 29 | ALKADI Zain | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 30 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 92% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 8% |
| 32 | KOE Declan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ZHOU Alex | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | GUO Joey | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | SHAW eric | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | FRASER Rhys | 100% | 97% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | PARK Jubin | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | JEONG David | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | ZENG Albert | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | FULLER Myles | 100% | 85% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 41 | HEARN Asa C. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | WANG Caleb | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 43 | WENGER Rowan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 44 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 45 | LESTER Ashton | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 46 | BABER Shaheer | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | ALKADI Deen | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 48 | BRIDGES Henry | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 49 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | CHOI Junwoo | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | JONES Gideon | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | CHIANG Aiden | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | NELSON Palmer | 100% | 96% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | ROBERTSON Liam | 100% | 37% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | ZHANG Justin | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.