Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
2 | CHO Emily (Euran) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
3 | REN Kayley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% | |
3 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 4% |
5 | MARISI Gianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 41% | |
6 | PARK Lina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 25% | |
7 | PARK Zena | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 9% | |
8 | WANG Sophia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | - |
9 | CHERNYKH Elina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - |
10 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 28% | |
11 | DAVIS Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | |
12 | WANG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | |
13 | ALKADI Mai | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | |
14 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
15 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
16 | GAO Anne | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
17 | RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
18 | BUDKO Julia | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
19 | ORRINGER Lottie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | 3% | |
20 | DESERANNO Seren | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
21 | BROWN Lily | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 1% | |
22 | TAN Isabella | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
23 | WRIGHT Taliyah | 100% | 100% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
24 | LIU Elinda | 100% | 99% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
25 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | |
26 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
27 | CHOI JULIE | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% | |
28 | DINH May | 100% | 94% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | |
29 | EVELAND Zoe | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
30 | ALLEYNE Taylar | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | - |
31 | CANO Sofia | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
32 | DONG Emily | 100% | 96% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | |
33 | QUINTERO Camila | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
34 | SHTEPA Rada | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
35 | LIN isabella | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - | |
36 | BRIDGES Camille | 100% | 72% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
37 | WANG hannah | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
38 | WRIGHT Trinity | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
39 | YOTHER Anna | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
39 | YAU Katie | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
41 | CHENG Emma | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
42 | KIM Alison | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
43 | REEVES June | 100% | 98% | 51% | 8% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.