Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Sophia M. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
2 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
3 | REN Kayley | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% | |
3 | WANG Amabel | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 4% |
5 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | 1% | 12% | 46% | 41% | |
6 | PARK Lina | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
7 | PARK Zena | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% | |
8 | WANG Sophia | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
9 | CHERNYKH Elina | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - |
10 | DENG Melissa | - | - | 2% | 20% | 50% | 28% | |
11 | DAVIS Logan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% | |
12 | WANG Joanna | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
13 | ALKADI Mai | 1% | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
14 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
15 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
16 | GAO Anne | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
17 | RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
18 | BUDKO Julia | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
19 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 23% | 3% | |
20 | DESERANNO Seren | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
21 | BROWN Lily | 1% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
22 | TAN Isabella | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
23 | WRIGHT Taliyah | - | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
24 | LIU Elinda | 1% | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | 1% | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
26 | ZELDIN Nadia | 1% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
27 | CHOI JULIE | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% | |
28 | DINH May | 6% | 33% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | |
29 | EVELAND Zoe | - | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
30 | ALLEYNE Taylar | 1% | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
31 | CANO Sofia | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
32 | DONG Emily | 4% | 36% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | |
33 | QUINTERO Camila | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
34 | SHTEPA Rada | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
35 | LIN isabella | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
36 | BRIDGES Camille | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
37 | WANG hannah | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
38 | WRIGHT Trinity | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
39 | YOTHER Anna | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
39 | YAU Katie | 33% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | CHENG Emma | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
42 | KIM Alison | 24% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
43 | REEVES June | 2% | 47% | 43% | 8% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.