Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ALLEN Graham | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 2 | PICCUS Isaac S. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | V D V V D D | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 3 | ZHANG Tianyi | D V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 5 | PARTRIDGE Lucas F. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 6 | LABROZZI Aidan | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | HU Andre B. | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | XIAN Ryan | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 9 | WHITEHURST JJ | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 10 | HODGE Jaydon L. | D V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 11 | ADLER Ethan M. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 13 | LAWRENCE Brendan D. | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 14 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 15 | CHAWLA Armaan | V D V D D V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 16 | GUMAGAY Paul | V V D D D V | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 17 | LI Jeffrey | V D V V V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 18 | MARKAS Justin W. | V V V V D V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 19 | BADIOLI Carlo | V D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 20 | LI Jeffrey | V V D D V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 21 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | D V V V V D | V D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 22 | KIM Minjun | V V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | KANACH Duncan | D D V V V V | V D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
| 24 | LU Sebastian X. | D V V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 25 | DEL CASTILLO Matthew Raymond M. | V D D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 26 | KIM Dohyun D. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 27 | GRENKE Brad | V V V D D D | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
| 28 | HOU Phi | V V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 29 | ZHENG Brian | V V D V D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 30 | STEVENS Daniel | D D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 31 | HU Alexander W. | D D D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 32 | LIU John | V D D D D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 33 | KENNEDY Kyle J. | V D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 34 | RITCHIE Mark T. | D V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 35 | KIRSCH Adam J. | D D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | HABIB III David P. | V D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 38 | KUHN Jeffrey | D D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 39 | WHITELOCK James R. | V D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 40 | TUCKER Owen J. | D D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 41 | OH Justin | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 41 | WIEDE Gerd | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 43 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 44 | HOFFMAN Shane C. | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 45 | LU Qi | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 46 | OBERLEITON Timothy | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 47 | TATE Leon J. | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
| 48 | AKOCS Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 49 | AKOCS Tony | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.