Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | FAYEZ Ayman A. | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 3 | DE GUZMAN Inaki P. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | XIAN Ryan | V D V D V D | V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 5 | SCHACK Samuel D. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 1.9 | 5 | +3.1 |
| 6 | INSLER Gabriel C. | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 7 | ZHENG Hagen | V D D V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 8 | SILVER Cameron | D D D V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 9 | ALLEN Graham | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 10 | SMITH Justin C. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 11 | TAE William G. | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | STOTT Donovan R. | V D V V D | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 13 | HOFFMANN Christopher J. | D V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 14 | BEKKER Mitchel | V D V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | LI Jeffrey | D V D D V | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 16 | YOON Nathan | V D D D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 17 | LAFVING Brandon | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 18 | KIM Juni C. | V V V D V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 19 | HILBERT Xavier | V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | LEE Timothy S. | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 21 | PARK Minchan | V D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 22 | HANXU Richard A. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 23 | KLASSEN Andrew P. | D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | CULLEN Daniel F. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | FREEMAN Daniel H. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 26 | TRAN Dai Long | V D V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 27 | XU Zitong (Evan) | V V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 28 | LIU John | D V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 29 | KIM Minjun | D D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | CHARRON Jack H. | D D D V D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 31 | JURGENSON Artemie A. | D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | LI Jeffrey | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 33 | PLUMER Jack E. | V V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 34 | DAVIS Jeffrey H. | V D V V D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 35 | O'HARA Keegan J. | V V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 36 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | V V D V D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 37 | ECKEL Anson J. | V V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 38 | DEL CASTILLO Matthew Raymond M. | V V D D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 39 | KUMAR Anitya | D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 40 | CHEN Wesley | V D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 41 | WALTHER Bryan M. | V D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 42 | YI Kyle | D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 43 | DE KLERK Ryan | V V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 44 | CHEN Eric Y. | V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 45 | MARCHANT Albert J. | V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 46 | CHAWLA Armaan | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 47 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | D V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 48 | HODGE Jaydon L. | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 49 | SOZANSKI Kyle S. | D D D V D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 50 | TATE Leon J. | D D V V D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 51 | TUCKER Owen J. | V V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 52 | ADLER Ethan M. | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 53 | LIU Kevin X. | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 54 | XIAN Riley | D D D D V D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 55 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | D D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 56 | LABROZZI Aidan | D D D D D V | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 57 | GARRISON Andrew T. | D D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 58 | KUHN Jeffrey | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 59 | KIRSCH Adam J. | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.