Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FAYEZ Ayman A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
| 3 | DE GUZMAN Inaki P. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 3 | XIAN Ryan | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | SCHACK Samuel D. | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 6 | INSLER Gabriel C. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 7 | ZHENG Hagen | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
| 8 | SILVER Cameron | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 9 | ALLEN Graham | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 36% | 6% |
| 10 | SMITH Justin C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 11 | TAE William G. | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 12 | STOTT Donovan R. | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | HOFFMANN Christopher J. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 14 | BEKKER Mitchel | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 15 | LI Jeffrey | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 16 | YOON Nathan | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | LAFVING Brandon | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 18 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 19 | HILBERT Xavier | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
| 19 | LEE Timothy S. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 21 | PARK Minchan | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | HANXU Richard A. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 23 | KLASSEN Andrew P. | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 24 | CULLEN Daniel F. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | FREEMAN Daniel H. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 26 | TRAN Dai Long | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | XU Zitong (Evan) | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 28 | LIU John | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | KIM Minjun | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CHARRON Jack H. | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | JURGENSON Artemie A. | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | LI Jeffrey | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | PLUMER Jack E. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 34 | DAVIS Jeffrey H. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 35 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | - | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 37 | ECKEL Anson J. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 38 | DEL CASTILLO Matthew Raymond M. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 39 | KUMAR Anitya | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 40 | CHEN Wesley | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 42 | YI Kyle | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 43 | DE KLERK Ryan | 16% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | CHEN Eric Y. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 45 | MARCHANT Albert J. | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | CHAWLA Armaan | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | SOZANSKI Kyle S. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 50 | TATE Leon J. | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | TUCKER Owen J. | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | ADLER Ethan M. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | LIU Kevin X. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | XIAN Riley | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 55 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 56% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | LABROZZI Aidan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 57 | GARRISON Andrew T. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 58 | KUHN Jeffrey | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | KIRSCH Adam J. | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.