Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
2 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% |
3 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 15% |
3 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | |
5 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
6 | CHEN Xiaohan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
7 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
8 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
9 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
10 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 35% |
11 | XIAO julie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - |
12 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
13 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
14 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
15 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
16 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
17 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
18 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
19 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
20 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 62% | |
21 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
22 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
23 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
24 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
25 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
26 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 3% |
27 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
28 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
29 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
30 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
31 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
32 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
33 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
34 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
35 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
36 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
37 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
38 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
39 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 21% |
40 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 2% | |
41 | KALISOVA Kristyna | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
42 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
43 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% |
44 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% |
45 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 33% |
46 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
47 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
48 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
49 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
49 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
49 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | 2% |
52 | WU Helen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
53 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
54 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
55 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
56 | CHANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
57 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | 6% |
58 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
59 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
60 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
61 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% | |
62 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
63 | LU Elaine | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
64 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
65 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
66 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
67 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
68 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
69 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
70 | SADIK HANA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 6% |
71 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
72 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
73 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
74 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | |
75 | XI Shining | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
76 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
77 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
78 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
79 | STONE Coral | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
80 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
81 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
82 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
83 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
84 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | 4% |
85 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
85 | LI YING CHU | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
87 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
88 | WANG yining | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
89 | ELSHAKANKIRI Janna | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
90 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 4% | |
91 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | |
92 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% | |
93 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
94 | LIU Zhi Jun | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
95 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
96 | SENOGLU Irmak | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
97 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
98 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
99 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
100 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
101 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
102 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
103 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
104 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 3% |
104 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
106 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
107 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
108 | WEBER Juliana I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
109 | CHARLES Caitlin | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
110 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
111 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
112 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
113 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 10% | |
114 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
115 | FANG Sophie | 100% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
116 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
117 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
118 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
119 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - |
120 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
121 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 95% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
122 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 1% |
123 | YANG Lea | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
124 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
125 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 94% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
126 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
127 | DONDERIS Katherine | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
128 | JOHNSON Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
129 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
130 | TREACY Aisling | 100% | 95% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
131 | GRULICH Rayaana | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
132 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
133 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
134 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
135 | GOLDIN Nina | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
136 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
137 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
138 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 94% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
139 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
140 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
141 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
142 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
143 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
144 | SHUM Cindy | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
145 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
146 | PENG Florella | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
147 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
148 | KIM Elyssa | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
149 | LEE Lauren | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
150 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
151 | HITOMI Nadya | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
152 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
153 | CHEN Jessica | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
154 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | - |
155 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
156 | WANG Gloria | 100% | 85% | 51% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
157 | HU Michelle | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
157 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
159 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - |
159 | CHUNG Hailey | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
161 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
162 | ZHOU Jacquelyn K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
162 | TURIANO Nadelle | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
164 | BAWA Anahat | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
165 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
166 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
167 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
168 | JOHNSTON Lily | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
169 | ZHANG Chenfei | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
169 | WANG Ziqi | 100% | 87% | 54% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
171 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 100% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
171 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
173 | SAAD Alia | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
173 | CHO Michelle | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
175 | SULLIVAN Madilyn R. | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
176 | DE SILVA Augusta | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
177 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 70% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
178 | KUANG TongFei | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
179 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
179 | CHAN Kayla | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
181 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
182 | NEUMAN Ella | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
183 | GOURNEAU Sophie L. | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
183 | DONG Angel | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
183 | LI Jiaying | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
186 | ZHAO Emily W. | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
187 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
187 | BROWNER June | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
189 | ZHANG Ruijia Alexa | 100% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.