December NAC

Div I Women's Saber

Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 2:00 PM

Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 KIM Zoe V V V V D D V V V V V V V 5.4 4 -1.4
2 ANGLADE Alexis C. V V D V V D V V V V V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
3 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. V D V V V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
3 SHOMAN Jenna V V V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
5 CODY Alexandra C. V V V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
6 SHI Cathleen D V V V V V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
7 VADASZ Ibla P. V V V V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
8 GOUHIN Chloe D V V V D V V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
9 POSSICK Lola P. V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
10 ERIKSON Kira R. V V V V V V V V D 2.8 6 +3.2
11 BOIS Adele V V V V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
12 LINDER Kara E. V D V V V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
13 HILD Nisha V V D V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
14 SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne V V V D D V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
15 LI Amanda C. V V V D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
16 YANG Ashley M. V V D D D D V V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
17 SAYLES Nina R. V V V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
17 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
19 FOUR-GARCIA Madison V D V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
20 MARSEE Samantha V D V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
21 KONG Vera V V V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
22 LI Anna M. V V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
22 GEYER Carolina M. V D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
24 TURNER Zoe Y. V V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
25 BEVACQUA Aria F. D V V V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
26 LEE Alexandra B. V D D V V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
27 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. D V V V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
28 KER Grace V D V D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
29 SZETO Chloe V V D D V D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
30 LIN Audrey J. D D D V V V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
31 CHIN Erika J. D D V D V D V V D 4.1 2 -2.1
32 WILLIAMS Chloe C. V D D D V V D 2.9 1 -1.9
33 DUCKETT Madison V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
34 LUKER Sophia D V V V V V D 1.7 5 +3.3
35 KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora V V V V D V D 5.3 5 -0.3
36 CALLAHAN Chase J. V V V V D V D 3.6 5 +1.4
37 GREENBAUM Atara R. D V V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
38 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V V D V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
39 LU Elaine V V V D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
40 DUNGEY Amelia S. V V V V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
41 LIU Sophie V V V D V D 2.7 4 +1.3
42 BLUM Leah I. D V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
42 ANDRES Katherine A. D V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
44 NATH Trisha V D V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
45 DRAGON Rainer V V D D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
46 JOHNSON Dagny L. V V V D D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
47 GHAYALOD reya V V D D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
48 JUNG Irene D V V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
49 MCKEE Brynnley D D V V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
50 LU Amy V V D D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
51 ANDRES Charmaine G. D V V V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
52 XI Shining D D V V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
53 ZEGERS Anneke E. D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
54 WU Helen V V V D D V D 1.3 3 +1.7
55 HARRISON Imogen N. D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
56 MOZHAEVA MARIA V V D V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
57 SATHYANATH Kailing D V D V V V D 3.0 3 -
58 LIAO Siwen V D D V V V D 1.1 3 +1.9
59 CHEN Xiaohan V D V D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
60 GHOSH Priyanka D V D V V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
61 VESTEL Mira B. V V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
62 HUAI Delilah D V D V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
63 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. V V D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
64 XIAO julie V D D V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
65 OLSEN Natalie J. V V V D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
66 GORMAN Victoria M. D D V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
67 SINHA Anika V D V V V D D 2.4 4 +1.6
68 NGUYEN Siena V V D V V D D 1.8 4 +2.2
69 HASSAN Aziza R. V V D D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
70 BUHAY Rachel T. V D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
71 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. V D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
72 JOHNSON Lauren D V V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
73 SOURIMTO Valeria D V V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
74 CHANG Audrey V D V V D D D 1.7 3 +1.3
75 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. V V D D V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
76 YODER Bridget H. D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
77 TONG Jessie D V V D D V D 1.4 3 +1.6
78 MULAGARI Sadhika D D V V D V D 1.2 3 +1.8
79 WEBER Juliana I. V D V D V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
80 CHIANG Emily V D V V D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
81 MIKA Veronica V D D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
81 ATLURI Sara V. D D V D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
83 LEE Hannah D D D V V D 2.1 2 -0.1
84 HE Charlotte V D D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
85 STONE Hava S. D D V V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
86 FREEDMAN Janna N. D V D D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
87 HWANG Gabriela M. V V D D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
88 FERREIRA Alejandra E. V D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
88 MUND Ruth D D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
90 WEI Vivian W. D D D V V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
91 PAUL Lila D D D V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
92 KIM Marley I. V D D D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
93 CHANG Emily V D D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
94 GUTHIKONDA Nithya D V D D D V D 4.1 2 -2.1
95 SO Catelyn D V D V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
96 YANG Lea V D D D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
97 MANSPERGER Leena V D V D D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
97 ELSHAKANKIRI Janna D D D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
99 ZHOU Jacquelyn K. D V V D D D D 2.0 2 -
100 LUKASHENKO Angelina D D V D D 1.3 1 -0.3
101 STAPLETON Lindsay K. D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
102 SADOVA Olga D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
103 YUAN Greta D D D D V 2.0 1 -1.0
104 YAO Rainie D D D V D 0.6 1 +0.4
105 HUANG MADELINE V D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
106 LIGH Erenei J. D D V D D 1.6 1 -0.6
107 ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
108 BOYNTON Ainsley D D D V D 0.3 1 +0.7
109 ENDO Miyuki N. D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
110 JEONG Katie V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
111 CHIN Sophia J. D D D D D V 3.4 1 -2.4
112 LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
113 SADIK HANA D V D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
114 WEI JoyAnn D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
115 CHEN Ashley D D D D D V 2.4 1 -1.4
116 KHAN Alissa D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
117 MARYASH Samantha D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
118 WANG Zidan D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
119 WIGGERS Susan Q. D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
119 SLOBODSKY Sasha L. D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
121 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. D D D D D 3.2 0 -3.2
121 GRAFF Sophie D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
123 SCOTT Eve D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
124 COLTER Aurora D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
125 LEE Sophia D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
126 LIU Zhi Jun D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
127 KALISOVA Kristyna D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
127 YU Zhiang D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.