Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 2 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 3 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 27% | |
| 3 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 5 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 6 | SHI Cathleen | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 7 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 8 | GOUHIN Chloe | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% | |
| 9 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 52% |
| 10 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | < 1% |
| 11 | BOIS Adele | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | ||
| 12 | LINDER Kara E. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 13 | HILD Nisha | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 14 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 29% | |
| 15 | LI Amanda C. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 16 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 17 | SAYLES Nina R. | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 19 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 20 | MARSEE Samantha | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | KONG Vera | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 22 | LI Anna M. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 22 | GEYER Carolina M. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 24 | TURNER Zoe Y. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
| 25 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 27 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% | |
| 28 | KER Grace | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 29 | SZETO Chloe | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 4% |
| 30 | LIN Audrey J. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 31 | CHIN Erika J. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 6% |
| 32 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% | ||
| 33 | DUCKETT Madison | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
| 34 | LUKER Sophia | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 35 | KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 45% |
| 36 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 37 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 38 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 39 | LU Elaine | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 40 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | |
| 41 | LIU Sophie | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 42 | BLUM Leah I. | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | |
| 42 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | |
| 44 | NATH Trisha | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | DRAGON Rainer | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 46 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 47 | GHAYALOD reya | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 48 | JUNG Irene | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 49 | MCKEE Brynnley | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 50 | LU Amy | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 51 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | |
| 52 | XI Shining | 2% | 15% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 53 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 54 | WU Helen | 18% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 56 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 57 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
| 58 | LIAO Siwen | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 60 | GHOSH Priyanka | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 61 | VESTEL Mira B. | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | ||
| 62 | HUAI Delilah | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 63 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 10% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | XIAO julie | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 65 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 66 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 67 | SINHA Anika | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 68 | NGUYEN Siena | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 69 | HASSAN Aziza R. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 70 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 71 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | |
| 72 | JOHNSON Lauren | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
| 73 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 74 | CHANG Audrey | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 75 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 76 | YODER Bridget H. | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | ||
| 77 | TONG Jessie | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | WEBER Juliana I. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 80 | CHIANG Emily | 6% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 81 | MIKA Veronica | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 81 | ATLURI Sara V. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 83 | LEE Hannah | 3% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 84 | HE Charlotte | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 85 | STONE Hava S. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 86 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 87 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 88 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | 15% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 88 | MUND Ruth | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 90 | WEI Vivian W. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 91 | PAUL Lila | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 92 | KIM Marley I. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 93 | CHANG Emily | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 94 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 95 | SO Catelyn | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 96 | YANG Lea | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 97 | MANSPERGER Leena | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 97 | ELSHAKANKIRI Janna | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 99 | ZHOU Jacquelyn K. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 100 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 101 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | 2% | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 102 | SADOVA Olga | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 103 | YUAN Greta | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 104 | YAO Rainie | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 105 | HUANG MADELINE | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 106 | LIGH Erenei J. | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 107 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | |
| 108 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 109 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 110 | JEONG Katie | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 111 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 112 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 113 | SADIK HANA | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 114 | WEI JoyAnn | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | CHEN Ashley | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 116 | KHAN Alissa | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 117 | MARYASH Samantha | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 118 | WANG Zidan | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 119 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 119 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 121 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 121 | GRAFF Sophie | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 123 | SCOTT Eve | 37% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 124 | COLTER Aurora | 42% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 125 | LEE Sophia | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 126 | LIU Zhi Jun | 14% | 53% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 127 | KALISOVA Kristyna | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 127 | YU Zhiang | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.