December NAC

Cadet Women's Foil

Sunday, December 11, 2022 at 12:00 PM

Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIU Jaelyn A. - - 2% 11% 38% 49%
2 SENIC Adeline - - - - 6% 33% 61%
3 CHEN Jia P. - - - - 2% 23% 75%
3 TAN Kaitlyn N. - - - 2% 16% 44% 38%
5 CHEN Allison V. - - - 2% 12% 40% 46%
6 ZHANG Alina C. - - 2% 15% 45% 38%
7 CHUSID Mikayla - - - - 5% 31% 63%
8 YANG Iris - 1% 6% 26% 44% 23%
9 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. - - - 6% 35% 59%
10 PENG Amber L. - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 17%
11 LI Rachel Y. - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
12 RANDOLPH Piper - 1% 6% 25% 44% 25%
13 LIN Zhi tong - 3% 16% 36% 34% 11% 1%
14 NAMGALAURI Mariam - 2% 16% 38% 34% 9%
15 GU Maggie Runlin - 1% 8% 29% 40% 20% 2%
16 SONG Yuqiao Aprille - - 2% 12% 37% 40% 9%
17 FEDELI Caterina S. - - - 2% 12% 40% 46%
18 MANIKTALA Prisha - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 2%
19 HAYES Nadia - - 1% 7% 28% 45% 19%
20 CHO Rebecca H. - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
21 SOOD Ishani S. - - 1% 7% 38% 54%
22 SEO IRENE Y. - 1% 6% 25% 44% 25%
23 LIU Joy Zhaoyi - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
24 CHEN Chloe I. - - 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
25 MI Aileen - - 4% 19% 39% 31% 7%
26 LEE Lavender - - 3% 16% 41% 40%
27 NISSINOFF Alexandra 3% 17% 35% 32% 12% 1%
28 ZHENG Julie - 1% 7% 26% 41% 23% 3%
29 SHEN Lydia - - - 1% 11% 37% 51%
30 NIKOLIC Alexandra - - 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
31 CHEN Renee - 1% 8% 28% 42% 20% 2%
32 ZHOU Catherine 1% 10% 33% 36% 16% 3% -
33 PEVZNER Victoria - - - - 6% 32% 62%
34 EYER Hailey M. - - - - 5% 34% 60%
35 FUNG Vera - 1% 8% 26% 39% 23% 4%
36 FUNG Emma - - 5% 23% 42% 27% 3%
37 LEE Ji Ahn 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 3%
38 BATRA Chaahat - - 4% 30% 51% 15%
39 LIPKOVITZ Rivka - 1% 11% 32% 37% 16% 2%
39 LEUNG Mei Hang (Danise) - 3% 14% 31% 34% 16% 2%
41 OH Ceana 1% 16% 39% 32% 10% 1% -
42 YANG Audrey 1% 15% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
43 SUN Ruoxi - - 2% 11% 29% 38% 19%
44 WANG Jasmine 5% 21% 34% 27% 10% 2% -
44 LAI Sophia 4% 20% 36% 28% 10% 1% -
46 CHANG Elizabeth - 4% 20% 38% 30% 7% -
47 MU Allison 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3% -
48 KOSTELNY Alexis - - 5% 22% 40% 27% 5%
49 ORVANANOS Anice - 1% 6% 24% 39% 26% 5%
50 SHIM Grace J. - 3% 18% 38% 30% 9% 1%
51 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia - - 6% 29% 48% 16%
52 SEIGEL Norah - 2% 17% 49% 28% 4%
53 SHA Yi Ling 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
54 DAVIES Ellie 4% 23% 39% 26% 7% 1%
55 JANG Kimberley - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
56 WONG Sophia M. - 2% 12% 33% 36% 14% 2%
57 DAVIS Bonnie Z. - - 4% 19% 40% 31% 5%
58 WANDJI Anais - - 1% 6% 29% 49% 15%
59 SUN Emily 1% 9% 28% 36% 22% 5% -
60 SEAL Cameron I. 1% 16% 37% 32% 12% 2% -
61 MEI Sarah - 2% 23% 46% 25% 4%
62 ROY Layla - 4% 23% 42% 26% 5%
63 GOOR Viviene E. - - 2% 12% 35% 42% 9%
64 HSU Kaylin 1% 16% 35% 32% 14% 2% -
65 BIODROWICZ Julia - 9% 45% 36% 9% 1%
66 CALISE Ella - 3% 17% 39% 33% 7%
67 BRYZGALOVA Svitlana - - 4% 25% 48% 23%
68 SIMONOV Dasha 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
69 YAN Noelle 3% 36% 43% 16% 2% -
70 WHELAN Amelia 1% 9% 32% 38% 18% 3%
71 WANG Zoie Z. - 6% 26% 39% 23% 5% -
72 CHOI Kailyn 2% 20% 39% 29% 9% 1% -
73 MARKOVSKY Nina - 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 2%
74 VAUGHAN Norah - 4% 22% 40% 27% 7% -
75 LAMBERT Mahala - 1% 5% 22% 39% 28% 5%
76 ZHANG Selena 4% 19% 37% 29% 10% 1% -
77 SUN Ning Lu (Sophia) 1% 15% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
78 CHARALEL Jessica 5% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1%
79 HAYES Alyssa R. 2% 14% 37% 34% 12% 1%
80 LEE Allison - 9% 34% 42% 14% 1%
81 LUO Sandra J. - 1% 7% 26% 43% 23%
82 KIM Rachel 1% 8% 29% 40% 20% 3%
83 CHOW Annabelle 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 2%
83 WANG Alison 7% 29% 38% 21% 5% -
85 WELBORN Calissa 2% 16% 36% 33% 11% 1%
86 SHEN Emilia 3% 19% 38% 30% 9% 1%
87 HOBSON Ava 2% 22% 52% 21% 2% -
87 TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol 40% 42% 16% 3% - -
89 GU Emily 1% 7% 25% 38% 25% 5%
90 KULKARNI Sohah A. 1% 20% 44% 29% 6% -
91 KO Claire 24% 41% 26% 7% 1% -
92 TRACZ Calleigh D. 2% 15% 36% 33% 12% 1% -
93 WANG Celine S. 14% 38% 34% 12% 2% - -
94 LI Eleanor 11% 38% 35% 13% 2% - -
95 DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) 1% 14% 35% 34% 14% 2% -
96 SHUM Maya 1% 12% 35% 37% 14% 2% -
97 CHATEL Margot 6% 24% 35% 24% 9% 2% -
98 PAULUS Sloane E. 7% 25% 34% 24% 8% 1% -
99 GANDLURI Sreehitha 3% 27% 42% 23% 5% - -
100 BOLES Amanda X. 3% 20% 39% 29% 9% 1% -
101 VO Bao-Vy 2% 14% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
102 LUO Miranda 3% 31% 41% 20% 4% - -
103 DANIELYANTS Gabriela 17% 46% 29% 7% 1% - -
104 PAULUS Isabella 36% 42% 18% 4% - - -
105 BEAVER Hannah 1% 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% -
106 KAPOOR Saanvi 59% 35% 6% - - -
107 YU Jane 24% 53% 21% 2% - -
108 RICHARD Dominique 15% 42% 32% 10% 1% -
109 WANG Chloe 9% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
110 LI Yuhe 6% 27% 38% 23% 6% -
111 CHENG Isa 77% 22% 1% - - -
112 NIRGUDE Siddhi 43% 42% 13% 2% - -
113 HAFEZ Tahiyah 1% 18% 41% 30% 9% 1% -
114 DESAI Esha 55% 36% 8% 1% - - -
115 WANG Yudi 2% 17% 39% 30% 10% 1% -
116 CASTANEDA Keira 1% 8% 27% 38% 21% 5% -
117 YURKOVA Mariia 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
118 GOEL Riyana 45% 42% 12% 1% - - -
119 GAO Anne 40% 42% 15% 2% - - -
120 LIN Ju-An Adrianne 1% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
121 PENG Charlotte 13% 41% 34% 11% 1% - -
122 LEVY Avery 8% 31% 39% 18% 4% - -
123 MARTIRE Alessandra 30% 44% 22% 4% - - -
124 PHILLIPS Hattie 6% 32% 39% 18% 4% - -
125 CHAKRAPANI Ila 65% 29% 5% - - - -
126 LEE emily 37% 42% 17% 3% - -
127 CHEW Alexis T. < 1% 5% 21% 38% 29% 5%
128 PATTERSON Natalia 36% 42% 18% 4% - -
129 HWANG Chanel 69% 27% 4% - - - -
130 TAYLOR Gabrielle 83% 16% 1% - - -
131 MCKAY Teresa 77% 21% 2% - - - -
132 XIE Su 13% 61% 23% 3% - -
133 BASSIK Eva 14% 49% 29% 7% 1% -
133 SOLOMIE Sabina 52% 41% 7% - - -
135 LAWRENCE Nia 77% 21% 2% - - - -
136 FONG Carys 17% 53% 25% 5% - - -
136 FONG Ellis 15% 40% 33% 11% 1% - -
138 PADDOCK Hannah 80% 19% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.