National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Veteran 70 & Older Men’s Foil (V70MF)

Saturday, June 28, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Register

Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2962 3164 - 2794
5 - 8 2535 2694 - 2397
9 - 16 2067 2565 - 1685
17 - 23 1346 2362 - 999

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Streb, Joseph Columbus International Fencing Academy B24 3164 2784.87
2 Darricau, Henri Denver Fencing Center B25 2992 2678.14
3 Bennett, Philippe Fencers Club Inc. A21 2899 2528.66
4 Biebel, Joseph AZ United Fencing Club C25 2794 2415.06
5 Patterson, Jan Salle Auriol Seattle D25 2694 2333.42
6 Lutton, Thomas Denver Fencing Center B25 2510 2217.12
7 Patterson, Malcolm Rockville Fencing Academy C24 2538 2054.84
8 Sessions, Adrian Bay Area Fencing Club C25 2397 1883.77
9 Ress, Michael Hudson Centers For The Martial Arts C23 2410 1829.58
10 Carter, Tony Olympian Fencing Club C23 2159 1565.01
11 Kazimiroff, Paul Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) U 2128 1563.93
12 Gladnick, Michael Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA C24 1836 1419.16
13 White, Neal RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D21 2565 1407.26
14 Brykczynski, James Bucks County Academy Of Fencing U 1901 1311.47
15 Williams, Theodore Cyranos Place U 1850 1014.44
16 Tierney, Luke Iowa City Fencing Center D22 1685 993.17
17 Flohr, Lester Southwest Florida Fencing Academy U 2362 913.15
18 Mazza, Daniel Davis Fencing Academy U 1375 662.74
19 Hill, David Boston Fencing Club U 1156 615.14
20 Anderson, Donald New Mexico Fencing Foundation U 1174 520.10
21 Rogers, Windell Nova Fencing Club U 1102 277.23
22 Chandlee, Richard (Rick) Calvert-Arundel Fencers U 1257 < 0
23 Rose, James Cape Cod Fencers U 999 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!