Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
2 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% | |
3 | SHEALY Maggie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
3 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
5 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
6 | HONE Katarina G. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
7 | WALTER Zsofia R. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
8 | MACE Eliza M. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
9 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
10 | LIU Rachel | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
10 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | |
12 | ZHOU Rebecca M. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
13 | CHEN Erica | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
14 | CHANG Emily | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
15 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
16 | YURT Leyla | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
17 | DARINGA Arianna | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
18 | AKARD Micah M. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
19 | CANSECO Laura K. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
20 | BEATY Carlee | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
21 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
22 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
23 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
24 | TANG Annie L. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
25 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
26 | TAO Hannah J. | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 1% | |
27 | GUZMAN Claudia | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
28 | MA Grace C. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
29 | SPORN Melanie | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
30 | HU Allison C. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
31 | CANNON Sophia E. | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.