Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | V V V V V V | V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | PINGEL Thomas J. | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | TRAIN Timothy D. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 3 | SZEGO Levente (Levi) | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | V V V V D V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 6 | MARKOWITZ William M. | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | MOORE Guy L. | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 8 | BADIOLI Carlo | D D D V D D | V V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 9 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | V V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 6 | +3.2 |
| 10 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | GRENKE Brad | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 12 | NEWSOME James L. | D V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | NEMAZIE David A. | D V V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 14 | CORINALDI Greg | V V D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 15 | SNYDER John W. | D D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 16 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | D D D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 17 | GUMAGAY Paul | V V V V D D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 18 | LOGAN Mark P. | D D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 19 | KUHN Jeffrey | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 20 | SCHROEDER William | V D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 20 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | D V D D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 20 | WIEDE Gerd | D D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 23 | LU Qi | D D D V V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 24 | HOFFMAN Shane C. | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 25 | WEIDMAN Jess | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 26 | TATE Leon J. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 27 | RITCHIE Mark T. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 28 | AKOCS Tony | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.