National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Epee (V40ME)

Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 12:00 AM

Register

Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3417 3875 - 3012
5 - 8 2721 2900 - 2570
9 - 16 2318 2819 - 2084
17 - 25 1937 2492 - 1626

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Tsinis, Alexander New York Athletic Club A25 3875 3520.59
2 Mandoki, Sandor Halberstadt Fencers' Club A25 3399 3063.67
3 Hurme, Tommi Olympian Fencing Club A25 3383 3051.99
4 Pho, Eric Fencers Club Inc. A25 3012 2738.05
5 Carter, Austin Penta Olympic Fencing Club A25 2900 2628.71
6 Cox, Matthew B23 2837 2279.29
7 Christy, Peter Cardinal Fencing Academy A24 2576 2230.74
8 Conklin, Jim Windy City Fencing-Chicago C25 2570 2206.00
9 Chu, Brandon North Shore Fencers Club B24 2391 2106.42
10 Mendoza, Zandro LA International Fencing A25 2432 2077.50
11 Evert, Todd Royal Arts Fencing Academy C25 2401 2029.53
12 Pai, Dong-Ying Twin Cities Fencing Club C24 2819 1829.58
13 Peng, Gregory Salle Auriol Seattle D24 2218 1822.39
14 Edgecomb, Michael Foothills Fencing Academy C24 2087 1761.85
15 Shull, Marc Windy City Fencing-Chicago D25 2084 1758.19
16 Sloter, Lewis Invictus Fencing C25 2111 1740.36
17 Lawlor, Lee Bucks County Academy Of Fencing - West D25 2159 1688.32
18 Kim, Jeff Elite Fencing Academy (GA) C24 2036 1666.27
19 Reed, David Rain City Fencing Center C24 1968 1638.12
20 Rhea, Eric Central Iowa Fencing Academy E23 1872 1308.27
21 Vrubel, Nathan Brazosport Fencing U 1643 977.29
22 Tomasi, John Smokey Mountain Fencing U 1858 973.06
23 Cho, Hans Battle Born Fencing Club U 2492 876.62
24 Chiang, Andrew New York Fencing Academy U 1626 517.68
25 Chi, Kai-Hung Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1775 276.72

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!