National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Cadet Men’s Foil (CDTMF)

Wednesday, July 2, 2025 at 12:00 AM

Register

Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2770 2915 - 2602
5 - 8 2560 2850 - 2455
9 - 16 2191 2347 - 2025
17 - 26 1704 1976 - 1325

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Ling, Eddie Massialas Foundation (M Team) A24 2915 2657.52
2 Derrick, Blake Silicon Valley Fencing Center B25 2672 2420.21
3 Dong, Richard B25 2891 2412.75
4 Doell, Ethan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. B25 2602 2348.64
5 Chen, Nuo Future Stars Fencing D25 2850 2250.98
6 Li, Aaron Moe Fencing Club LLC B24 2476 2223.59
7 Kim, Daniel Silicon Valley Fencing Center B24 2458 2204.69
8 Cheng, Logan Star Fencing Academy B25 2455 2203.31
9 Lu, Alex Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy C24 2347 2088.56
10 Tan, Xinlai Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club C24 2310 2020.46
11 Zhong, Maxwell Silicon Valley Fencing Center B24 2220 1968.22
12 Ge, Felix Fei Renaissance Fencing Club C25 2214 1958.73
13 Zhou, Shawn LA International Fencing E24 2185 1923.02
14 Hickey, Connor Queen City Fencers Club LLC B24 2153 1896.20
15 Fang, Haoyu Renaissance Fencing Club C24 2073 1819.60
16 Li, Daniel Team Touche Fencing Center D24 2025 1731.50
17 Xu, Nathan Moe Fencing Club LLC E24 1976 1725.10
18 Pe, Noah Team Touche Fencing Center D24 1976 1695.25
19 Zhao, Ryan East Coast Fencing Club D25 1932 1665.44
20 Fraser, Rhys Bluegrass Fencers' Club E25 1841 1550.16
21 Lao, Kevin Moe Fencing Club LLC E24 1696 1412.58
22 Foy, Grant Elite Fencing Club E24 1672 1379.43
23 Zhang, Andrew Bay Area Fencing Club U 1627 1297.87
24 Lo, Ernest Prime Fencing Academy E25 1639 1269.19
25 Hu, Daniel Gold Fencing Club E25 1325 1022.21
26 Chenutula, Abhinav OnTarget Fencing Club U 1353 900.57

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!