Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GUZMAN Rafael (RJ) J. | D D D V V | V V V V V V | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 2 | LIN William | V V D D D | V V V V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 3 | SHI Andrew | V V D D V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | WANG Qifa | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 5 | KIM Minwook | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | GOLAS Brandon P. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | TAKEMARU Leo | V V V D V D | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 8 | BARNETT Adam | V D D V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 9 | YEN Darren | V V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 10 | TANG Brendan J. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 12 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 13 | LOBO-BERG Gabriel (G) K. | D V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 14 | ZU Kevin | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 15 | BULANOV Alex Z. | D D D V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 16 | LINSKY Matthew | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 17 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | V V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 18 | NG Jonathan H. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 19 | GOSALIA Rishab | V V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 20 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 21 | WYCHE Scott H. | V D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 22 | KIM Avery J. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 23 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 24 | RONGET Gaspard | V V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 25 | VACCARI Braden | V D D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | HARRIS Alex K. | D V V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 27 | HENNICKE Michael G. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 28 | HUAYTA James W. | V D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 29 | LUO ZiRui | V D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 30 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | V V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 31 | CHO Brandon | D D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 32 | XU Michael | D V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 33 | MORRIS Samuel A. | D V V V V D | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 34 | LASORSA Matthew | V V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 35 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | V D V V V D | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 36 | YEN Preston | V V V D D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 37 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | V V V D D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 38 | CACERES Hernan | D D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 39 | WIND Nicky E. | D V V V D D | D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 40 | WU Nicholas R. | D D D V V V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 41 | WUN William | V V V D D D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 42 | HUDDY Brandon J. | D V V D D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 43 | GHOSH Tuhin | D V D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 44 | TANG Albert | V D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 45 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | D D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 46 | GANTA Vijay | D V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 47 | KAHN Justin M. | D D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 48 | CHAN Daniel | D D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 49 | STEINMETZ John | D V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 50 | STANLEY Hanno | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 51 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | D D D D V D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 51 | ZHOU Miles | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 53 | WALKER Robert Connor | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 54 | JUN Ryan | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 55 | GOOSMAN Antonio R. | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 56 | TREJO Oliver | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 56 | FISK Ethan | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 58 | CHEN Henry H. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 60 | REYES Kyle | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 62 | ZATZ Ben Z. | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.