Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUZMAN Rafael (RJ) J. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 19% | |
| 2 | LIN William | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 3 | SHI Andrew | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 3 | WANG Qifa | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 5 | KIM Minwook | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 6 | GOLAS Brandon P. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 7 | TAKEMARU Leo | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 8 | BARNETT Adam | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 9 | YEN Darren | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 10 | TANG Brendan J. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 11 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 12 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 13 | LOBO-BERG Gabriel (G) K. | 1% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 14 | ZU Kevin | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 15 | BULANOV Alex Z. | 5% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 16 | LINSKY Matthew | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 18 | NG Jonathan H. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 19 | GOSALIA Rishab | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 20 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | WYCHE Scott H. | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | KIM Avery J. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 31% | 8% |
| 24 | RONGET Gaspard | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | VACCARI Braden | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | HARRIS Alex K. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 27 | HENNICKE Michael G. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | HUAYTA James W. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 29 | LUO ZiRui | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 31 | CHO Brandon | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | XU Michael | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 33 | MORRIS Samuel A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 34 | LASORSA Matthew | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 36 | YEN Preston | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 38 | CACERES Hernan | 3% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 39 | WIND Nicky E. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 40 | WU Nicholas R. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 19% | 3% |
| 41 | WUN William | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 42 | HUDDY Brandon J. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | GHOSH Tuhin | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | TANG Albert | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | GANTA Vijay | 1% | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 47 | KAHN Justin M. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 48 | CHAN Daniel | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 49 | STEINMETZ John | 1% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | STANLEY Hanno | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 51 | ZHOU Miles | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | WALKER Robert Connor | 43% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | JUN Ryan | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 55 | GOOSMAN Antonio R. | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | TREJO Oliver | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | FISK Ethan | 36% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | CHEN Henry H. | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 60 | REYES Kyle | 3% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | ZATZ Ben Z. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.