John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SAYERS Kali | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 55% |
| 2 | LEE yat ching | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 48% | 16% |
| 3 | PATIL Amulya | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 3 | NEELAM Neha | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 5 | NGUYEN Audrey | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 6 | BENZAN India | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
| 7 | PLAZA-GASALLA Gloria | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 8 | ROWLAND May | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
| 9 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | - | 2% | 22% | 52% | 24% | ||
| 10 | MACEDON Gianna | 1% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 11 | SPURLIN Alicen | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% | |
| 12 | CHIN Sia | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 13 | WANG Zarina | 1% | 18% | 51% | 27% | 4% | ||
| 14 | BARCLAY Khyri | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 15 | BYRON Karen J. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | |
| 16 | MOON Seojung | - | - | 9% | 43% | 48% | ||
| 17 | NIEMAN Aubrey | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 18 | FORDER Isabel | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 19 | BOWIE Charlotta | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 20 | WONG Caitlin | 2% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | MIHILL Margaret | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | BYBEE Lucy J. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 24% | 2% |
| 23 | OSTRIKOFF Michelle | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 14% | 1% | |
| 24 | HABER Emily | 38% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 25 | DONGES Anna | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 26 | RHEINECKER Claire | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | COURTNEY Elya Rebekah | 1% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 28 | MOSS Riley | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | NOH Rachel | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 30 | KIZILBASH Zara | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 11% | |
| 31 | NIEMAN Anjolie | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | JULIEN Erica | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | BANKS Lauren M. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 34 | JACKSON Viktoria | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 35 | DAVIS Shanna | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | MAY Courtney | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | ||
| 37 | RAFFERTY Catherine | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | BRITTON Kiera | 21% | 47% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
| 40 | RHEINECKER Eleanora Grace | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | ALLEY Mary Ellis | 9% | 56% | 30% | 4% | - | ||
| 42 | SHARIF Cate | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.