John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SAYERS Kali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 2 | LEE yat ching | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 16% |
| 3 | PATIL Amulya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% | |
| 3 | NEELAM Neha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
| 5 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 6 | BENZAN India | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 7 | PLAZA-GASALLA Gloria | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 8 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 9 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 24% | ||
| 10 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 11 | SPURLIN Alicen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | |
| 12 | CHIN Sia | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 13 | WANG Zarina | 100% | 99% | 82% | 30% | 4% | ||
| 14 | BARCLAY Khyri | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 15 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
| 16 | MOON Seojung | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 48% | ||
| 17 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | |
| 18 | FORDER Isabel | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 19 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 20 | WONG Caitlin | 100% | 98% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | MIHILL Margaret | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% | 2% |
| 23 | OSTRIKOFF Michelle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% | 1% | |
| 24 | HABER Emily | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 25 | DONGES Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | |
| 26 | RHEINECKER Claire | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | COURTNEY Elya Rebekah | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
| 28 | MOSS Riley | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | NOH Rachel | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 30 | KIZILBASH Zara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 11% | |
| 31 | NIEMAN Anjolie | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | JULIEN Erica | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | BANKS Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
| 34 | JACKSON Viktoria | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 35 | DAVIS Shanna | 100% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | MAY Courtney | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | ||
| 37 | RAFFERTY Catherine | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | BRITTON Kiera | 100% | 79% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 40 | RHEINECKER Eleanora Grace | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | ALLEY Mary Ellis | 100% | 91% | 35% | 4% | - | ||
| 42 | SHARIF Cate | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.