Rain City Fencing Center - Bellevue, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MITBERG Gregory W. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% |
| 2 | HAYES Nadia | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 3 | GELLER Adam T. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 2% |
| 3 | SHAGIDANYAN German | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | MCINTOSH Caleb | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 6 | ZOBEL Eric H. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 36% | |
| 7 | KIM Andrew J. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 8 | BERK Theo | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 9 | SHAJI Karthik | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 43% | 15% |
| 10 | SEIDL Cassidy M. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | STACKHOUSE Andre L. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 12 | KRYLTSOV Michael | - | 7% | 39% | 40% | 13% | 1% | |
| 13 | LEE Christopher T. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% | 1% |
| 14 | WEI Qiancheng | - | 4% | 29% | 45% | 20% | 3% | |
| 15 | GUTIERREZ Nikolai A. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 25% | |
| 16 | VALENTINE Iain | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 17 | GRANHOLM Carolyn | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 37% | 7% |
| 18 | TANG Julian | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 19 | STACKHOUSE Nina L. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | DONG Quintin | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | YAN Noelle | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 22 | LIPPMAN Sam | - | - | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
| 23 | LEE Jayden | 8% | 36% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | ROZALSKI Eli | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | LIU Aaron Zixian | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | KLEIN Johannes | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 27 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 28 | TROXEL Sylvie A. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 29 | GELLER Daniel | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | COSGROVE Jameson | 2% | 36% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | BEAVER Hannah | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | NISTER Jonathan | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 34% | 3% |
| 34 | FECAROTTA Ryan | 71% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | CHRISTIAN Jonathan | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | HARROCH Faustin | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | POWERS Doug A. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | ROSSMAN Brock | 17% | 61% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 39 | VALENTINE Eoin | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SCHULTZ Nomi | 76% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.