Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 2 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 3 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 3 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 6% |
| 5 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% |
| 6 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 7 | CHESSA Giovanni | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 8 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 14% |
| 9 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 10 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% |
| 11 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
| 12 | MCQUIDE Elliot | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 13 | GE Daniel | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 14 | WANG Rory | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | GARDINER Luke J. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 16 | WU Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | DENG Kenny | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 18 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 22 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 23 | ABANILLA Luke | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 24 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | BILODEAU Leo | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | ROWAN Danny | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | WILSON Samuel S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 28 | HAZLETT Grady | 100% | 94% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | FENG Michael | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CANEDO James | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | ABRUZZESE Owen | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 34 | SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ Alex | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 35 | IREZ Connor | 100% | 95% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.