The Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 2 | HO Addison | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 52% | 21% |
| 3 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 90% |
| 3 | CHERNYKH Elina | - | - | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
| 5 | REN Kayley | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 6 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 35% | |
| 7 | ZOU Ella | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 8 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% | |
| 9 | DENG Melissa | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 54% | 14% |
| 10 | LEVESQUE Brielle | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 7% |
| 11 | BROWN Lola | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 40% |
| 12 | GUO Audrey | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 37% | 5% |
| 13 | DUAN Sophie | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 14 | ZHANG Ivy | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 15 | DAVIS Logan | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 61% |
| 16 | CHOI Sophie | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 17 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
| 18 | KIM Erin | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% |
| 19 | BAE Yooju | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | ZHANG Gwenyth | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
| 21 | LI Joy | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | - |
| 22 | HAN Gian | - | - | 2% | 21% | 47% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | ZEE Savannah | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 17% | 1% |
| 24 | WU Chingfei Amber | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 25 | PARK Lauren | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | POEI Lauren | - | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 28% | 1% |
| 27 | YU Sophie | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LEE Jeemin | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 30 | GOITIA Genevieve | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | ZHANG Zoey | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LEE Zoe | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LU Keeva | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 34 | FUNG Sarafina | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | CHANG Lydia | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
| 36 | SREENIVAS Ridhi | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% | |
| 37 | SOE Hayleigh | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | WANG Emma | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHOU Joi | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | DUVVA Sanika | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | BEHL Alessandra | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 42 | HUGHES Olivia | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 43 | TELEB Farida | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Viviana | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | CHANG Olia | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 46 | LUO Miranda | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 19% | 57% | 22% |
| 47 | DENG Claire | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 47 | MILCH Noa | - | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 49 | CHEN Madeleine | 4% | 27% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | CHANG Olivia | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 51 | NICHOLS Ellington | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 52 | LIM Kora | 31% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | LIM Kensie | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LIU Celia | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | CHU Felicity | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | PECK Madeleine | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | WU Emma | 14% | 47% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | LEE Madeleine | 51% | 40% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | DERSHEM Abby | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | LI Jasmine | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 62 | LAI Miranda | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 63 | YU Sien | 8% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | TUMULA Anima | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | HU Avery | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 66 | ETIKALA Saanvi | 22% | 54% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | CHIANG Aria | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.