Tim Morehouse Fencing Club - Port Chester - Port Chester, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | ELSISSY Ziad A. | - | - | - | 6% | 29% | 45% | 21% | |
2 | DERSHWITZ Eli R. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 45% | 51% | |
3 | MAROUF Eyad | - | - | - | - | 6% | 55% | 39% | |
3 | AMER Mohamed | - | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
5 | CHENEY Christopher (Chris) M. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
6 | THOMPSON Khalil A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% | |
7 | WANG Robert | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
8 | SHAINBERG Jonah L. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% | |
9 | BOOTH Zaheer | - | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 78% | |
10 | KEITA Mamoudou | - | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
11 | WESTERN Rafael | - | - | 1% | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | |
12 | KIM Shaun M. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
13 | CORTEZ Christopher | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
14 | CHEN Evan P. | - | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
14 | KEITA Babacar | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
16 | MOREHOUSE Timothy F. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 47% | 10% | |
17 | MICLAUS Justin | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 44% | 7% | |
18 | BAE Jason I. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% | |
19 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
20 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
21 | DENG Andrew | - | - | 20% | 52% | 26% | 2% | - | |
22 | GUALTERO Samuel | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
23 | PRIMUS Nazir | - | 2% | 22% | 48% | 26% | 2% | - | |
24 | FORMENTI Giulio | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
25 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | CHUNG Connor | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
27 | BARNETT Adam | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% | |
28 | NG Jeremiah | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
29 | ZENG Noah | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
30 | GANTA Vijay | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 41% | 4% | - | |
31 | REFAEE Ahmed H. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 3% | |
32 | KIM Matthew | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | - | |
33 | SHI Erick | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | |
34 | CADAMBI Roshan | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 1% | - | |
35 | LIU Kevin | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
36 | STAMIS Kyle | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
37 | MCKEE Brynnley | 2% | 12% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | YUAN Kevin | - | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - |
39 | WAXLER Seth B. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
39 | SUGIURA Samuel | 2% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | BABAYEV Ethan I. | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | |
42 | ERENHOUSE Walter | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
43 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 1% | 16% | 48% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
44 | KAHN Justin M. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 14% | 1% | |
45 | WAXLER Aaron M. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% | |
46 | VENU Ram | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | |
47 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
48 | GUVEN Coco | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
49 | LIN Nicole | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% | |
50 | ZHU Charlie | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | - | |
51 | ERENHAUSE Blake | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
52 | GULLO Ethan B. | 13% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
52 | TSAO Alister | 42% | 43% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
54 | TOZZI Massimo | 14% | 54% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
55 | STONE Martin | 9% | 38% | 41% | 12% | - | - | - | |
56 | TAN Ethan | 16% | 46% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | SIERRA Kate | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - | |
58 | WAXLER Ryan | 13% | 43% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
59 | BUCK Maximilian | 20% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
60 | RUIZ Eric | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - | |
61 | TSAO Oliver | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
61 | BERGER Jacob | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |
63 | KUNZ Peter | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | |
64 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.