Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACZIK Adam W. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 2 | CHENG Thomas | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% | |
| 3 | PHO Eric | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 3 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 6% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 5 | ROSTAL Scott E. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
| 6 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 7 | WILKINSON Derek H. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 5% |
| 8 | REED David | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 9 | ARROWSMITH II Alan M. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% | |
| 10 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 44% | 28% | |
| 11 | CHOI Paul S. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 12 | MAKMATOV Vadim | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 13 | RUSKIN David I. | 5% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | STOCK Jordan | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 15 | HARRELL D. Fox | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 16 | DAVIS Kelly | 64% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 17 | HESS Marc F. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 18 | LUO Aaron | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 19 | SPRINGER Michael | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 20 | LIOU Solomon | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | EDGECOMB Michael J. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 22 | MENDOZA Zandro | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | KIM Jeff | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | MCCONVILLE Brendan M. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 25 | PENGELLY Neil | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.