Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACZIK Adam W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 2 | CHENG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% | |
| 3 | PHO Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | |
| 3 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 94% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 5 | ROSTAL Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
| 6 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 7 | WILKINSON Derek H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 5% |
| 8 | REED David | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 9 | ARROWSMITH II Alan M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 10 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 28% | |
| 11 | CHOI Paul S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
| 12 | MAKMATOV Vadim | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
| 13 | RUSKIN David I. | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | STOCK Jordan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 15 | HARRELL D. Fox | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | DAVIS Kelly | 100% | 36% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 17 | HESS Marc F. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 18 | LUO Aaron | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 19 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 20 | LIOU Solomon | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | EDGECOMB Michael J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 22 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | MCCONVILLE Brendan M. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 25 | PENGELLY Neil | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.