Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 2 | FRANK Fred | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 3 | HUGHES Michael D. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 3 | JENSEN David | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 5 | AMELI Sean | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 6 | GLASS Timothy C. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 7 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | DELGADO Jr. Eli M. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 9 | MASE James B. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 10 | VARNEY John R. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 11 | ALEXANDER Chuck | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
| 12 | WATRALL Rick | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 13 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 14 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 15 | KAROLAK Dale W. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 16 | BAXTER Daniel J. | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 17 | SEGAL Mark N. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 18 | RICHARDS Dick | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 19 | MARIANI Lou | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 20 | RANES Evan | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 21 | DARRICAU Henri J. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 22 | POPPRE Michael N. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 23 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 24 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | - | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% |
| 25 | SZOKOLAY Robert E. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | WHEELER Mark C. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 27 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 28 | WAGMAN Robert S. | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 29 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | EVANS Allen L. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | SWANSON Dave | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | DICKSON Tim | 15% | 38% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | KLEIN Johannes | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | POOLE James M. | 3% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 35 | MARSHALL William L. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 36 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 37 | HUNKER Frederick | 36% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | KRUGER Mark | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 39 | NEALE James H. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 40 | GROSS Louis A. | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | BALESTRACCI Chris | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SCOTT George R. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 43 | MONES Robert (Bob) J. | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | LIPTON Michael D. | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | PETRUNCIO Emil | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | SWANN William A. | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 24% | 48% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 48 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 6% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 51 | TIERNEY Luke | 23% | 46% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | HVIDING Ketil | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.