Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% | |
| 2 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 29% | |
| 3 | FLINT James E. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 4% | |
| 3 | GOOSSENS Bruno | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 34% |
| 5 | BALLARD Mark V. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 26% | |
| 6 | BOTHELIO Jere P. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% | |
| 7 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | - | 2% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 7% | |
| 8 | PATTERSON Malcolm (Werewolf) D. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 9 | NEWSOME James L. | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 10 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 11 | SPAHN Jeff | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 12 | RESS Michael A. | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | HENZLER Thomas A. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 28% |
| 14 | MOREAU John A. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 15 | BLAKLEY Dwain | - | 1% | 20% | 46% | 28% | 5% | |
| 16 | REDDING Russel M. | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | PARY Theodore | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% | |
| 19 | HEWITT Frank F. | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% | |
| 20 | MULLARKEY Edward (Ed) | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 21 | HENRY Mark R. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | WALKER William H. | - | 8% | 45% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | BRONZO Thomas E. | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | REA John P. | 6% | 34% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | CAMPE Kazimieras M. | - | 4% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 27 | MOORE Thomas (Tom) L. | 10% | 62% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 28 | HOLLINGSWORTH Frank J. | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 29 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | 5% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | 18% | 68% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | FRANK William N. | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | MEHALL Michael | 10% | 39% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | WEBER Dick | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | KENT James (Jim) R. | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | GALLIVAN James | 55% | 37% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.