Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Ivan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% |
| 2 | ELBAKRY Mahmoud | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
| 3 | BACON Michael F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% |
| 3 | NEVEROVICH Vitaly V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% |
| 5 | THORNTON Ronald J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% |
| 6 | MATT Chris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 36% |
| 7 | WAXLER Aaron M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 8 | BUKOWSKI Todd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | 3% |
| 9 | MAKOGON Sergey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
| 10 | PENTON Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 15% |
| 11 | CHU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 12 | ZIPPER Michael E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | 3% |
| 13 | KALLIO Jeffrey E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
| 14 | ANFORA Andrew T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | GRAFF Jon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | - |
| 16 | BAKER Keith L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 17 | ZIRKLE James | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | < 1% |
| 18 | YUNG Wang Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | ZOLLER Matthew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 20 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 21 | LUKIBANOV Oleg | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | 4% |
| 22 | HERNDON Jameson D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 22 | ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | KRASNICH Mike | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | ZINNI Gene | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | ISSA Naoum P. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KAOURIS George | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 12% | - |
| 28 | LEAR Donald W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | - |
| 28 | BABAYEV Ethan I. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 30 | KASTOR Jacaeber | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% |
| 31 | DUDNICK Christian | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | SZATHMARY Michael J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | - |
| 33 | CAISSE Michael J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 34 | LILLARD Samuel N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 35 | PLONKA Derek | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 36 | GRAINGER Robert | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 37 | KATZ Jason | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | BARANOVSKY Valera | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | SU Ji | 100% | 92% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | HICHA Paul R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% | 6% | - |
| 41 | DAHL Chris | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 42 | WANG Albert | 100% | 85% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 43 | FIROOZI Farzeen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 44 | ELDER John | 100% | 98% | 78% | 27% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | DHAR asif | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | BOYLAN John R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% | - |
| 47 | SEGALE William J. | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | CRETEN joachim | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | DAWSON Todd | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | BIESIADA Jacek W. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | ASHBY Rob | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | STONE Brad | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | GORMLEY Peter J. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | GREEN Robert | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | SIMS Martin L. | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.