Pasadena Convention Center - Visitors Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
| 2 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 3 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
| 3 | PONS Diego | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 17% | |
| 5 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 6% | |
| 6 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% |
| 7 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 13% |
| 8 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 17% |
| 9 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% | |
| 10 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 6% |
| 12 | BAKER Ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 13 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | 1% |
| 14 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 15 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 16 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 9% |
| 17 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% |
| 18 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
| 19 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 8% | |
| 20 | DENG David | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 21 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 22 | KAWADA Sebastien | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% | |
| 23 | MORTON Joshua | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 24 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% | |
| 25 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 96% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 2% |
| 28 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | SEIGEL Duncan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | LING Carson Jr | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 31 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 32 | PE Noah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 33 | PARK David | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | |
| 35 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | FOY Grant | 100% | 90% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 38 | DANIEL Nikith | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | DULAI Agam | 100% | 84% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | ZHOU Austin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 41 | SHORTER David Alexander | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | PARK Roy | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | FLANAGAN Miles | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | DULAI Angad | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 49 | DACKO Nolan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 50 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | GUO Joey | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 53 | GALLO Michael | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 54 | SHARDONOFSKY Keelan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 55 | TURNER Finian | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | WU Thomas | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | DROPKIN Mason | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | DEJOURNETT Jacob | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.