Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LU Yikai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 2 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 12% | |
| 3 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 3 | DORE Davis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 5 | POLONSKI Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 44% | |
| 6 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 7 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 21% | |
| 8 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 26% | |
| 9 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 10 | XIAO Bowen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% | |
| 11 | GRIFFITH Kian | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 12 | BOYKO Miles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 12% | |
| 13 | METTE Russell | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | ZHAO Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
| 15 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
| 16 | OLSON Emerson | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | IRVINE Brody | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 19 | FU Steven | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 20 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% | |
| 21 | MCKINLEY Luke | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | GLOVER George | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 100% | 82% | 33% | 5% | - | - | |
| 24 | HOWLAND Jonas | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | NEYMAN Sampson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% | |
| 26 | TOWNE Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 27 | NAZARIO Dominic | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 3% | |
| 29 | RAJPAL Alastair | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 30 | HEYBOER Jason | 100% | 77% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | SLUSHER Gideon | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 32 | WINGLER Cole | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | BIESIADA Jan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 2% | |
| 33 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% | - | |
| 35 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 36 | TATE Liam | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | PHONPRASANSACK Grayson | 100% | 85% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 11% | 1% | |
| 39 | MODADUGU Aryan | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | SMITH Cooper | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | RYAN Nash | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 42 | HERRERA Xavier | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | WEISS Quintin | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | WEI Thomas | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | LAKAS Darius | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | MICK Gabriel | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | SANDERS Jack | 100% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | FIEDOR Jakub | 100% | 96% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.