Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 2 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 34% |
| 3 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
| 3 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% |
| 5 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 67% | 17% |
| 6 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 28% |
| 7 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% |
| 8 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
| 9 | PAN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 40% |
| 10 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 11 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 4% |
| 12 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | 3% |
| 13 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 13 | ANDERSON Christian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 20% |
| 16 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 17 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 14% |
| 18 | QI Steve | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 19 | GAO Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 3% |
| 20 | SINGH RANGER Vir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 21 | LI Ayren | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 24 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 25 | PLASTARAS Trey | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 54% | 13% |
| 27 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 28 | MCQUIDE Elliot | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | LIU Charles | 100% | 83% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | PROMRAT Pete | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 31 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 32 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 33 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 34 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 35 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 36 | SHYKA-BROWN Simon | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 98% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | DONG sean | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 39 | FRANK Amir | 100% | 96% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | ZHANG Teddy | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | LACHAPELLE Cole | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 43 | PELT Ethan T. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | LOGAN Kai | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | LIU Jeremiah | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | TING Clement | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | EBERMAN Henry | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | LU Jason | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 49 | LOU Felix | 100% | 78% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.