Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
2 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 51% | 35% |
3 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
3 | LENK Sophie | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 7% | |
5 | KO Claire | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 6% |
6 | ZHANG Ivy | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
7 | SUN Chloe | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 47% | 43% |
8 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
9 | WYNN Kylie | - | - | 7% | 31% | 44% | 18% | |
10 | YONG Rosalind | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
11 | DENG Melissa | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% | |
12 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
13 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
14 | CARVAJAL Sofia | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
15 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
16 | ZOU Ella | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
17 | PENG Charlotte | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 15% | |
18 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
19 | BARTON Nanea | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
20 | SHUM Maya | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 7% |
21 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 2% | 18% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
22 | MORALES Paulina | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
23 | GUO Audrey | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 1% | - |
24 | COX Sophia | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
25 | GOEL Riyana | 6% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
26 | ANDONIAN Lauren | 1% | 14% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
27 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
28 | DESAI Esha | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
29 | LEVESQUE Brielle | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
30 | LIU Ariana | 3% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | LI Joy | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
32 | PEDERSEN Haley | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
33 | KIM Sydney | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
34 | MANIMTIM Rachel | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
35 | POEI Lauren | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
36 | WU Chingfei Amber | 14% | 47% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
37 | VILLARAMA Kara | 15% | 47% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
38 | CHANG Olivia | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
39 | CHANG Janelle | 8% | 38% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
40 | LUCAS Ava | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | HUGHES Olivia | 57% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
42 | MILES Quinn | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
43 | CHOI Sophie | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
44 | CHEN Elysia | 61% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | |
45 | BENNYHOFF Naia | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
46 | CHU Felicity | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.