Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JOHNSON Aidan J. | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 2 | PRINCE Nicholas J. | D D D V V D | V V V V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 3 | FARRAG Sherif G. | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 5 | BLUTT Emerson B. | V V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
| 6 | LIU Niles J. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 7 | YU Vinni | V V V V D D | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | WU Albert | D V D V D V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 9 | CANDESCU Cristian | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 10 | SPIRLI Francesco | V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 11 | CHO Justin Y. | V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | HEALY Griffen | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | KASI Sanjay | V D V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 14 | LOCKWOOD Owen | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 15 | GEE Brandon | V V V D D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 17 | EMMER Chase T. | V V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 | |
| 18 | JANG Jaewon | V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 19 | MA Alexander | V V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 20 | GRIGORIEV Eduard | V V V V D D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 21 | BRANDT-OGMAN Adlai | V D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | BROOKES Scott L. | V D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 23 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | V V D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 24 | ZHOU Timmy | V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 25 | BADRIGIAN William H. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 26 | LIU Eric P. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 27 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | V V D V D D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 28 | RITCHIE Luke W. | D D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 29 | WU Wesley E. | D D V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 30 | REGE Advaith | D V D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 31 | DICKSON Farr R. | D D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 32 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 33 | BATRAK Alexander | V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 34 | LIN Richard W. | D D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 35 | WETMORE Lucas W. | D V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 36 | HEWES Thomas G. | V V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 37 | HO Ryan J. | V V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 38 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | D D V D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 39 | SIEGEL Elliot | D D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 40 | LEE Daniel C. | V D V D D D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 | |
| 41 | MILLER Trent D. | D D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 42 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | D D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 43 | LAWRENCE John W. | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 44 | ZHANG Henry C. | D V D D D | D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
| 45 | IVARSSON Oliver | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 46 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 46 | COOK John J. | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 48 | HERGERT Benito | D D V D D D | D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
| 49 | ONIK Elijah T. | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 50 | RINEHART Conner M. | D D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 51 | CORTIZAS John (Jack) | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 51 | RECHLER Logan | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 53 | ENGEL Henry R. | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 54 | FU Samuel Y. | D D V D D D | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.