Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Alexander | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
2 | JIANG Owen | - | - | 7% | 39% | 43% | 11% | |
3 | LI Yao (Liam) | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% |
3 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | 2% | 21% | 47% | 30% | |
5 | GONG Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
6 | XU Andy P. | - | - | - | 7% | 56% | 37% | |
7 | WANG Mason | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 46% | 11% |
8 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
9 | LI Ayren | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
10 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 49% | 33% |
11 | LI Aaron | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
12 | LIU Derek | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% |
13 | WANG Jackson | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
14 | CHENG Ethan | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
15 | PO Oliver | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
16 | KONG Luculentus X. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
17 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
18 | SHAO Eric | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - |
19 | XU Ethan | - | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
20 | WHELAN Alexander H. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
21 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 14% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
22 | SOLOPOULOS James | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
23 | ZHANG Aaron | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
23 | LU Guanxun (James) | 10% | 38% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
25 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
26 | LAO Kevin | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
27 | WU Andrew Y. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
27 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
29 | ZHENG Harrison | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
30 | LOGAN Kai | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
31 | HUANG Julian | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
32 | LU Jason | 10% | 42% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | LIU Jeremiah | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
34 | REN Bingye | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
35 | BINETTE Wyatt | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
36 | TANG Terry | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
37 | WANG justin | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
38 | ARRISON Alexandrew C. | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
39 | ZHOU Lyon | 9% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - | |
40 | FEINBERG James Y. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - | |
41 | TAN Aidan | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
42 | ZHANG Teddy | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
43 | WANG Junqi | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | |
44 | XU Jasper | 9% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - | |
45 | LEE Eugene | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
46 | POULIN Sam | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.