Midwest ROC/RJCC

Cadet Women’s Foil (CDTWF)

Saturday, December 20, 2025 at 3:00 PM

Register

Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2068 2207 - 1995
5 - 8 1949 1967 - 1930
9 - 16 1680 1939 - 1471
17 - 22 1384 1712 - 1114

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Horowitz, Shuli RedStar Fencing Club Chicago C25 2207 1954.70
2 Zoldan, Gweniveve RedStar Fencing Club Chicago C25 2075 1820.55
3 Swope, Farren Fencing Center Of Chicago C24 1995 1732.86
4 Kang, Marian Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club D25 1995 1729.97
5 Fraser, Morgan Bluegrass Fencers' Club E25 1967 1714.05
6 Harris, Parker Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy B25 1955 1693.42
7 Yang, Olivia Bluegrass Fencers' Club E25 1944 1685.03
8 Rivera, Leahy RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D25 1930 1678.07
9 CHOI, JULIE Auburn Fencing Club D25 1939 1667.48
10 Blakey, Heaven Culver Military Academy D25 1835 1571.02
11 Salmi-Bydalek, Ada Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E25 1758 1486.98
12 Shusta, Lily Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club D25 1698 1421.66
13 Stone, Sydney Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E25 1674 1365.44
14 Kashuba, Mila Eminence Fencing Academy E25 1554 1282.61
15 Leggett, Emilia South Youth Fencing Alliance (SYFA) E25 1514 1121.97
16 Utin, Alexandra Twin Cities Fencing Club E25 1471 1040.97
17 LaVine, Samantha Shoreline Fencers Club C25 1459 1027.45
18 Woerter, Therese-Margaret South Youth Fencing Alliance (SYFA) E25 1518 1019.87
19 Levy, Gabrielle RedStar Fencing Club Chicago E25 1280 921.77
20 Zoldan, Nolabelle RedStar Fencing Club Chicago E25 1219 906.38
21 Chandler, Annika Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1114 343.25
22 Chandler, Camille Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1712 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!