Midwest ROC/RJCC

Division II Women’s Epee (DV2WE)

Sunday, December 21, 2025 at 1:30 PM

Register

Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2397 2689 - 2055
5 - 8 1984 2059 - 1935
9 - 16 1792 2012 - 1590
17 - 26 1310 1806 - 1091

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Timmons, Sarah Red Door Fencing C25 2689 2301.18
2 Schultz, Gillian The Ohio State University NCAA C25 2572 2274.72
3 Chiem, Karen San Francisco Fencing Academy D25 2272 1977.57
4 jorgensen, Kjirsten Twin Cities Fencing Club C25 2055 1755.54
5 Swenson, Alexandra Ataba Fencing Club C23 2059 1725.10
6 Cai, Melody Windy City Fencing-Chicago E25 1976 1668.16
7 Nelson, Grace Escrime Du Lac C24 1935 1662.07
8 BARANOSKI, CHLOE Grand Rapids Fencing Academy C25 1966 1655.79
9 Burkhardt, Krista Ataba Fencing Club D25 2012 1598.83
10 Schliep, Anna Center for Blade Arts E25 1800 1492.75
11 Tang, Elaine Windy City Fencing-Chicago D24 1849 1492.46
12 Telci, Arya Center for Blade Arts C25 1864 1395.43
13 Culver, Hannah Center for Blade Arts D25 1760 1382.64
14 Wang, Emily The Fencers Academy E25 1766 1293.06
15 jorgensen, Rebekah Twin Cities Fencing Club E25 1699 1203.22
16 Skjei, Josephine Center for Blade Arts E25 1590 1025.35
17 Trusevich, Kate Grand Rapids Fencing Academy E24 1454 978.75
18 Hart, Jenna Davis Fencing Academy of Miami U 1420 917.76
19 Tisdale, Zaria Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1180 770.68
20 Chandler, Elle Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1393 645.78
21 Manianglung, Jean Skyward Fencing E25 1373 628.52
22 Solodin, Katia Center for Blade Arts U 1120 476.58
23 Ono, Melisa Ataba Fencing Club E25 1149 433.17
24 Cheever, Katie Skyward Fencing U 1113 267.48
25 D'Arco, Mia Illinois Fencers Club U 1806 < 0
26 Meshenberg, Zoe Skyward Fencing U 1091 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!