Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HAN Daniel Y. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
2 | GLOZMAN Justin | - | - | 5% | 30% | 59% | 6% | |
3 | DALAL Rohan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
3 | SAHAY Kenji | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 14% | |
5 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
6 | GINSBERG Jordan | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
7 | FORMENTI Giulio | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
8 | HUANG Tom | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
9 | WALKE Devin | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | < 1% |
10 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
11 | KIM Matthew | - | - | - | 5% | 37% | 57% | |
12 | ZHANG Jeffrey | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
13 | ZHU Charlie | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
14 | MORRIS Samuel A. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
15 | WONG Tzer | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% | |
16 | SPRANG Nicholas D. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
17 | HOPPA Luke H. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
18 | DEPEW Spencer | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
19 | SHAH Sajan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
20 | KIM ELIJAH | - | - | 3% | 22% | 55% | 21% | |
21 | LEE Andrew | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
22 | CHUNG Connor | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
23 | BRANDT Jaden | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
24 | AKS Ari | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
25 | TOZZI Massimo | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | BHASKAR Dhananjay K. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
26 | NGUYEN Anthony | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
28 | MAUREL Nicolas | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
29 | VOSS Jeffer | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
30 | BURGESS-LINDEN Ian | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
31 | KUMAR Arjun | 4% | 28% | 45% | 21% | 2% | - | |
32 | POSY Daniel | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
33 | CHENG Hong | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
34 | O'LEARY Wyatt P. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% |
35 | TANG Shu Hon | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
36 | LIN Philip T. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
37 | LUCAS Hayden | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
38 | WITCZAK Mateus | - | 5% | 27% | 49% | 17% | 1% | |
39 | CHANG ETHAN | 10% | 37% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | |
40 | BEAUCHAMP Declan | 15% | 44% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
41 | CHENG Brandon | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
42 | KIM Theodore | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
43 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
44 | DRUZHININ Michael | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
45 | ZHAO Lucas | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
46 | BHATIA Ekam | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
47 | SEN Christian | 7% | 37% | 41% | 14% | 1% | - | |
48 | KAY Gabriel | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
49 | LAUB William | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
50 | STONE Martin | 28% | 44% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
51 | DIMATTEO Michael | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | WANG HongXi | 13% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
53 | LEE Anderson | 9% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
54 | SHU Richard | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
55 | DING GeLun | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
56 | HENDERSON Jack | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
57 | MANESCU Miron | 25% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
58 | BARROWS Hunter | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
59 | XU Justin | 25% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
60 | TSAO Alister | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.