Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | |
| 2 | GLOZMAN Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 6% | |
| 3 | DALAL Rohan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 3 | SAHAY Kenji | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 14% | |
| 5 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% |
| 6 | GINSBERG Jordan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 7 | FORMENTI Giulio | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 8 | HUANG Tom | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 9 | WALKE Devin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | < 1% |
| 10 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 11 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 13 | ZHU Charlie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 14 | MORRIS Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 15 | WONG Tzer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | |
| 16 | SPRANG Nicholas D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 17 | HOPPA Luke H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 5% |
| 18 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 19 | SHAH Sajan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | KIM ELIJAH | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 21% | |
| 21 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 24 | AKS Ari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 25 | TOZZI Massimo | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | BHASKAR Dhananjay K. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 28 | MAUREL Nicolas | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 29 | VOSS Jeffer | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 30 | BURGESS-LINDEN Ian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | KUMAR Arjun | 100% | 96% | 68% | 23% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | CHENG Hong | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | O'LEARY Wyatt P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
| 35 | TANG Shu Hon | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 36 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LUCAS Hayden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 2% | |
| 38 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 18% | 1% | |
| 39 | CHANG ETHAN | 100% | 90% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | BEAUCHAMP Declan | 100% | 85% | 41% | 7% | - | - | |
| 41 | CHENG Brandon | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 11% | 1% | |
| 42 | KIM Theodore | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | DRUZHININ Michael | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | BHATIA Ekam | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | SEN Christian | 100% | 93% | 56% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | KAY Gabriel | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | LAUB William | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | STONE Martin | 100% | 72% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | DIMATTEO Michael | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | LEE Anderson | 100% | 91% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | SHU Richard | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | DING GeLun | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | HENDERSON Jack | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | MANESCU Miron | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | BARROWS Hunter | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | XU Justin | 100% | 75% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.