Boston , MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHENCK Koen M. | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 67% | |
| 2 | PAN Eric | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 49% | 12% | |
| 3 | KAZA Nitish | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 48% | 16% |
| 3 | LI Richard | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 5 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 48% |
| 6 | ZHANG Evan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 7 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 8 | PARK Ryan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 9 | BREIER Matthew F. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
| 10 | BING Charles | - | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 54% |
| 11 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% |
| 12 | LI Eric | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 13 | LI Yao (Liam) | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 3% |
| 14 | MENG Zhaoyi | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | WU Alexander | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% |
| 16 | FU Yifan | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 2% |
| 17 | BAE Kevin | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 18 | HONG Issac | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 20% | 2% |
| 19 | ZHONG Guoren | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 20 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 21 | GAO Anthony | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | TSAI Max W. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | LI Owen | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% |
| 24 | GU Andrew | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 25 | MCLEAN Miles K. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 26 | JIANG Owen | - | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 35% | 6% |
| 27 | MILLER Aidan A. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | TALLARICO Matthew | 2% | 19% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WANG Mason | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 7% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | WANG Alex L. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ZHAO Jesse | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | LI Arvin | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | LI Jinghua E. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 36 | VALENTON Timothy | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DE JAGER Robert | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | PELT Ethan T. | 35% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | LI Ayren | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 14% | 1% | |
| 40 | DONG sean | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 41 | PITERBARG Maxim | 4% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | JIN Dennis H. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | PROMRAT Pete | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | XU Mathu Yang | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | TAN Connor | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | ZHANG Mark | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | BOUSSY Luciano | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | HU Jason | 15% | 44% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | LIU Charles | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 51 | BAUMANN Gunnar | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | XU Bernard | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 53 | BEBER Bodhi | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 24% | 48% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | CHEN Matthew | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ABRUZZESE Owen | 6% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | CHEN Derek | 16% | 46% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | WANG Julang | 43% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | WILSON Samuel S. | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | TAYLOR Adam | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | GARDINER Luke J. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | FREEDMAN Theodore | 9% | 42% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.