Boston , MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DODIN David | - | - | - | 1% | 5% | 30% | 64% |
2 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
3 | BRODSKY Julian | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 18% | |
3 | SKORUPAN Grant | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
5 | XIE Brandon | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 1% |
6 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
7 | PARK Nicholas | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
8 | ZHAI Avalo | 10% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
9 | LI Zachary | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
10 | RIPA Joseph K. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
11 | JIANG Matthew | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
12 | FANG Hanning | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
13 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
14 | LAI Boden | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
15 | TRULL A.J. | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - |
16 | CHAO Nicholas | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
17 | PAN Tristan | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
18 | GUO ZIXU | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
19 | ROLAND Mackinley | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
20 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
21 | KIM Sian I. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
22 | BRADSHAW Carter | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
23 | LIN Zizhen | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
24 | SONG Troy | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
25 | LIU Luke | 6% | 34% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - | |
26 | CAFASSO Alexander | 5% | 34% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
27 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.