Maine West High School - Mount Prospect, IL, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SPINA Joseph | V | V V V V | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 2 | LI Chenyu (Charlie) | V V | V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 3 | YOON Brian | D V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 3 | ROBERTS Jonah | V | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 5 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 6 | IVANOV Phillip Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | ROCKELMANN Colin | V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 8 | GREENE Patrick | D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 9 | HETZ John Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | WANG David | V | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
| 11 | RAYMOND Rocco Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | CUI Franklin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | XINYI (JACKY) Yue Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | BRANNON Nathan | D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 15 | HAN Pleroma Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | JAMISON Harper | V D V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 17 | SMITH Dashiell Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | GROOTHUIS David | V V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 19 | BALCHAN Adam | V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 20 | BOZARTH Alex | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 21 | WANG Tyler | D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 22 | NADELLA Anish Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | BELUE William | D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 24 | HARRIS Jacob Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | SCHECHTER Noah | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 26 | THOMPSON Isaiah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | KTSANES Charles Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | ELLIS Occie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | JANSEN Isaac Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | KRANENBURG Max Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | DESAI Aadi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | CASH Max | D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
| 33 | SENECHAL Alexander Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | SLUTZKY Jake Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | MALEADY Sean | V D V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 | |
| 36 | SOSSONG Taso Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | WEATHERLY Hugh | D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
| 38 | PIFEL Camden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | KOSS Harrison | V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 40 | MCGUIRE Colman Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | BORUCKI Grant Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | MILEN Christopher Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | CLAY Joshua Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | HUTCHINS Westley Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | LEE Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | KOCIECKI Kacper Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.