Maine West High School - Mount Prospect, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SPINA Joseph | V | V V V V | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 2 | LI Chenyu (Charlie) | V V | V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 3 | YOON Brian | D V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 3 | ROBERTS Jonah | V | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 5 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 6 | IVANOV Phillip Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | ROCKELMANN Colin | V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 8 | GREENE Patrick | D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 9 | HETZ John Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | WANG David | V | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
| 11 | RAYMOND Rocco Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | CUI Franklin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | XINYI (JACKY) Yue Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | BRANNON Nathan | D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 15 | HAN Pleroma Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | JAMISON Harper | V D V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 17 | SMITH Dashiell Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | GROOTHUIS David | V V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 19 | BALCHAN Adam | V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 20 | BOZARTH Alex | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 21 | WANG Tyler | D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 22 | NADELLA Anish Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | BELUE William | D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 24 | HARRIS Jacob Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | SCHECHTER Noah | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 26 | THOMPSON Isaiah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | KTSANES Charles Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | ELLIS Occie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | JANSEN Isaac Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | KRANENBURG Max Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | DESAI Aadi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | CASH Max | D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
| 33 | SENECHAL Alexander Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | SLUTZKY Jake Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | MALEADY Sean | V D V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 | |
| 36 | SOSSONG Taso Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | WEATHERLY Hugh | D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
| 38 | PIFEL Camden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | KOSS Harrison | V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 40 | MCGUIRE Colman Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | BORUCKI Grant Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | MILEN Christopher Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | CLAY Joshua Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | HUTCHINS Westley Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | LEE Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | KOCIECKI Kacper Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.