The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SUN Ruoxi | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | KOROL Neta | V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | GOOR Viviene E. | D D V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 5 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 6 | PANT Anisha | D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | LI Shuang | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | RAO Sonia D. | D V D D V | V V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 9 | MU Allison | V V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 10 | MORADI Raiyan N. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | LUO Sandra J. | D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | ZHANG Eunice | D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | OH Ceana | V V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 14 | KOROL Dana | V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 15 | CASTANEDA Keira | V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | FUNG Vera | V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 17 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | FERNANDES Thea | D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 19 | KIM Rachel | V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 20 | PENG Serena | D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | LEE Allison | D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 22 | SEAL Julie T. | V D V D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 23 | WELBORN Calissa | V D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | BAIXAULI Carme | V D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 25 | CARVAJAL Sofia | D V D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 26 | SUN Emily | V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 27 | FUNG Emma | V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 28 | LENK Sophie | V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 29 | ZHENG Zoe | D D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 30 | QUINN Anna | D D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 31 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | D D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 32 | WANG Celine S. | V D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 33 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 34 | EDWARDS Darby | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 35 | NICKOLOV Nora | D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 36 | SEN Arjen | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 37 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 38 | GOEL Riyana | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 39 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 40 | PATTERSON Natalia | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 41 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 42 | SANDVIK Clarissa A. | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 43 | XIE Su | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.