The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 44% | |
2 | KOROL Neta | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
3 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 64% | |
3 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
5 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
6 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 4% | 29% | 52% | 14% | |
7 | LI Shuang | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 34% | 4% |
8 | RAO Sonia D. | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
9 | MU Allison | 1% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 5% | < 1% | |
10 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 2% |
11 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
12 | ZHANG Eunice | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
13 | OH Ceana | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
14 | KOROL Dana | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
15 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 6% | |
16 | FUNG Vera | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | |
17 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
18 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 39% | 11% | |
19 | KIM Rachel | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
20 | PENG Serena | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
21 | LEE Allison | - | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
22 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
23 | WELBORN Calissa | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
24 | BAIXAULI Carme | 7% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | |
25 | CARVAJAL Sofia | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
26 | SUN Emily | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 22% | 2% | |
27 | FUNG Emma | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
28 | LENK Sophie | 10% | 37% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | |
29 | ZHENG Zoe | 19% | 46% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
30 | QUINN Anna | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
31 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | |
32 | WANG Celine S. | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
33 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
34 | EDWARDS Darby | 10% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | |
35 | NICKOLOV Nora | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
36 | SEN Arjen | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
37 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
38 | GOEL Riyana | 37% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
39 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 33% | 46% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
40 | PATTERSON Natalia | 26% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
42 | SANDVIK Clarissa A. | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
43 | XIE Su | 15% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.