ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YU Zhiang | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% | |
| 2 | HUANG Rachael | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 3 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 3 | LAURI Keira | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 5 | BERMAN Greta | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 6 | KNOBEL Sophia | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 24% |
| 7 | LEOU Korina | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 8 | YOUNG Audrey | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 9 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
| 10 | HU Anna | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 11 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 12 | MALEK Zolie | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 43% |
| 13 | MERMEGAS Olivia | - | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% |
| 14 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 15 | CROOKS Riley | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% |
| 16 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | MYAT Chloe | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 49% | 21% |
| 18 | WANG Callie | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 42% |
| 19 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
| 20 | CHIANG Melissa | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 49% | 16% | |
| 21 | CHAVAN Arya | - | - | 3% | 23% | 47% | 27% | |
| 22 | BUSH Bethany | - | - | 4% | 27% | 46% | 22% | |
| 23 | PROBASCO Leila | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 24 | KWON Ava | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 25 | GUVEN Coco | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 26 | RANJAN Diya | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 27 | LIU Kelly | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 28 | HO Sophia | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | FOSS Persephone | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | GENTILE Vittoria | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | HILD Anya | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | VINOKUR Anita | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 33 | MAGITSKY Leila | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 34 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 41% | 13% | |
| 35 | CHAN Madeleine V. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 36 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 37 | KWON Ava | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 38 | IANNUZZI Lucy | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 39 | BORGUETA Madison | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 31% | 6% |
| 40 | TENG EMMA | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 41 | BAIREDDY Maya | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 42 | XU Demi | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 43 | MANSPERGER Gia | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 44 | KIM Audrey | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | FUNG Iris | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 46 | LIANG Claire | 2% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 8% | - | |
| 47 | YAO Annabelle | 23% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 48 | JUILLERAT Elina | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | UEMOTO Lynn | 2% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 51 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | BROWN Aria | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | HUANG Eleanor | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | PASUPULETI Laya | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | ALAMI Amira | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | KONNIKOV Esther E. | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 57 | LEE Kaitlin | 14% | 42% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | SHMULER Fiona | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | KULIK Sophia | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | WONG Charlene | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | PARK Haylie | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 62 | STADNIK Emilia | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 63 | REDA Sophie | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 64 | FIGELMAN Maya | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | RIFKIN Lielle | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 66 | KHERA Anya | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 67 | FONG Abigail | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | NEGROIU Mara | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | LEIGH Adalene | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 70 | KESSLER Amelia | 25% | 47% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 71 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 72 | ENG Madeleine | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | CHURCH Madeline | 30% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.