ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | |
| 2 | HUANG Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 3 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 3 | LAURI Keira | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 5 | BERMAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
| 6 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 24% |
| 7 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 8 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 9 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 10 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
| 11 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 12 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% |
| 13 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
| 14 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | CROOKS Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% |
| 16 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 21% |
| 18 | WANG Callie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 42% |
| 19 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 20 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 16% | |
| 21 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 27% | |
| 22 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 22% | |
| 23 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 24 | KWON Ava | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 25 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 26 | RANJAN Diya | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | 1% | |
| 27 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 28 | HO Sophia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | FOSS Persephone | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 2% |
| 30 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | HILD Anya | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | VINOKUR Anita | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 33 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 34 | BERRIOS Catalina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | 13% | |
| 35 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
| 36 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 37 | KWON Ava | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 38 | IANNUZZI Lucy | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | - | |
| 39 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | 6% |
| 40 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 41 | BAIREDDY Maya | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 42 | XU Demi | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 43 | MANSPERGER Gia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | FUNG Iris | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 46 | LIANG Claire | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 8% | - | |
| 47 | YAO Annabelle | 100% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 48 | JUILLERAT Elina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
| 49 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | UEMOTO Lynn | 100% | 98% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | BROWN Aria | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | HUANG Eleanor | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | PASUPULETI Laya | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | ALAMI Amira | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | KONNIKOV Esther E. | 100% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 57 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 86% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | SHMULER Fiona | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 59 | KULIK Sophia | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | PARK Haylie | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 62 | STADNIK Emilia | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 63 | REDA Sophie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 64 | FIGELMAN Maya | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | RIFKIN Lielle | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 66 | KHERA Anya | 100% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 67 | FONG Abigail | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | NEGROIU Mara | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | LEIGH Adalene | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 70 | KESSLER Amelia | 100% | 75% | 28% | 3% | - | - | |
| 71 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 72 | ENG Madeleine | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | CHURCH Madeline | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.