ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | |
2 | HUANG Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
3 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
3 | LAURI Keira | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
5 | BERMAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
6 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 24% |
7 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
8 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
9 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
10 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
11 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
12 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% |
13 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
14 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
15 | CROOKS Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% |
16 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
17 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 21% |
18 | WANG Callie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 42% |
19 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
20 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 16% | |
21 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 27% | |
22 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 22% | |
23 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
24 | KWON Ava | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
25 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
26 | RANJAN Diya | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | 1% | |
27 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
28 | HO Sophia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
29 | FOSS Persephone | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 2% |
30 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
31 | HILD Anya | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
32 | VINOKUR Anita | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
33 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
34 | BERRIOS Catalina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | 13% | |
35 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
36 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
37 | KWON Ava | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
38 | IANNUZZI Lucy | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | - | |
39 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | 6% |
40 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
41 | BAIREDDY Maya | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
42 | XU Demi | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
43 | MANSPERGER Gia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
44 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
45 | FUNG Iris | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
46 | LIANG Claire | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 8% | - | |
47 | YAO Annabelle | 100% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
48 | JUILLERAT Elina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
49 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
50 | UEMOTO Lynn | 100% | 98% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
51 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
52 | BROWN Aria | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
53 | HUANG Eleanor | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
54 | PASUPULETI Laya | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
55 | ALAMI Amira | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
56 | KONNIKOV Esther E. | 100% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
57 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 86% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | |
58 | SHMULER Fiona | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
59 | KULIK Sophia | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
60 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
61 | PARK Haylie | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
62 | STADNIK Emilia | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - |
63 | REDA Sophie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
64 | FIGELMAN Maya | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
65 | RIFKIN Lielle | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
66 | KHERA Anya | 100% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
67 | FONG Abigail | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
68 | NEGROIU Mara | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
69 | LEIGH Adalene | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
70 | KESSLER Amelia | 100% | 75% | 28% | 3% | - | - | |
71 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
72 | ENG Madeleine | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
73 | CHURCH Madeline | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
73 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.