ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
2 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% |
3 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | |
3 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
5 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
6 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
7 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | |
8 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
9 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% |
10 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
11 | GERRISH William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% |
12 | UNGERER Roger M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
13 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
14 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 18% | |
15 | WANG Auther | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
16 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
17 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
18 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
19 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
20 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
21 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 14% |
22 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
23 | MARTIN Mason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
24 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
25 | WOODCOCK Henry | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
26 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
27 | MOREA Anderson | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
28 | SION Andrew | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
29 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
30 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 5% | |
31 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
32 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
33 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
34 | HARRA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
35 | SUNDSTROM Wren | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
36 | BAI Austin | 100% | 97% | 72% | 28% | 4% | - | |
37 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
38 | HONG Logan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
39 | YAVENDITTI William | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
40 | PERLMAN Taiyo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
41 | CROWE Adam D. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
42 | WANG Luke | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
42 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 90% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | |
44 | MENDEZ Ren | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
46 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
47 | DAO-CRESPO Joaquin | 100% | 56% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
48 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
49 | KO Caleb | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 2% | |
50 | YANG Cooper | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 4% | |
51 | XU Nathan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | - | |
51 | GECKELER James | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 2% | |
53 | ZHENG Christopher | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
54 | BAI Brian | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
55 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
56 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
57 | KELSEY Simon | 100% | 98% | 76% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
59 | REYES Yannik | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
60 | SADYKOV Albert | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
61 | MOON Nicolas | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
61 | HWANG Jacob | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - | |
63 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 63% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
64 | COVELL Saunder | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
65 | CHANG Ian | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.