ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
| 2 | SEO Irene Y. | - | - | 9% | 44% | 47% | ||
| 3 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 3 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 51% |
| 5 | YU Lauren C. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 6 | CALISE Ella | - | 2% | 19% | 52% | 28% | ||
| 7 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 8 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 11% |
| 9 | ROY Layla | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 49% | 13% |
| 10 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 11 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 13 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% | 1% |
| 14 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 42% | 12% | |
| 15 | LI Eleanor | 2% | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | LENZ Zoe N. | 13% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | CHEN Renee | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 18 | PEVZNER Nicole | 1% | 19% | 54% | 23% | 3% | ||
| 19 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 20 | NEUMAN Sophie | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | XIANG Emma | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 23 | ZHANG Selena | 1% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | UNGERER Frieda | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 25 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 26 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 27 | PARK Caitlyn | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 29 | JIANG Claire | 15% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | PAULUS Sloane E. | 1% | 8% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | LEVY Avery | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | FIELD Julianna | - | 5% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | BERGEL Daphne | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | WANG Reese | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | HUNT Abigail S. | 7% | 58% | 31% | 4% | - | ||
| 36 | CHENG Isa | 50% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | LIN Victoria T. | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 38 | CHEN Sophie | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | PARK Jacqueline | 12% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | LIU Long | 17% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | CHEN Colyi | 85% | 15% | 1% | - | - | ||
| 42 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 43 | DALBERG Meadow | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | LI Yixin Catherine | 73% | 25% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 45 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.