ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MUND Ruth | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
2 | BULBA Daria | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 62% | |
3 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
3 | LIU Yifei | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 4% | |
5 | SCOTT Eve | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
6 | FESTA Carina | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
7 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
8 | YU Zhiang | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
9 | KHAN Alissa | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
10 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
11 | LEE Sophia | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
12 | WANG yining | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
13 | LOO Kaitlyn | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
14 | SO Catelyn | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
15 | CHEN Jessica | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
16 | DONG Angel | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
17 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
18 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
19 | ZENG Sarah | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
20 | BAWA Anahat | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
21 | SADOVA Olga | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
22 | YUAN Greta | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
23 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | |
24 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
25 | MONTORIO Lily M. | - | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
26 | MARYASH Samantha | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
27 | MALEK Zolie | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
28 | REN Xinling | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - | |
29 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 3% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
30 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | NAYAK Esha | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - | |
32 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
33 | GOMERMAN Sophia | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
34 | NAYAK Anika | 1% | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
35 | LAMEDICA Ava | 7% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
36 | MYAT Chloe | 1% | 28% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | |
37 | NAYAK Antara | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
38 | DAVIS Jordan | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
39 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
40 | RESTREPO URREGO Laura | 9% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
41 | STAFFORD Lillian | 30% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | LI Alexis | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
43 | KHERA Anya | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
44 | ONG Lauren | 37% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.