ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
2 | BULBA Daria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | |
3 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 62% |
3 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 4% | |
5 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 3% |
6 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
7 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
8 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
9 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
10 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
11 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
12 | WANG yining | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
13 | LOO Kaitlyn | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
14 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
15 | CHEN Jessica | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | |
16 | DONG Angel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
17 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
18 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
19 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
20 | BAWA Anahat | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
21 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
22 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
23 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | |
24 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
25 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
26 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
27 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
28 | REN Xinling | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - | |
29 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
30 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
31 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
32 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
33 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
34 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
35 | LAMEDICA Ava | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | |
36 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 99% | 71% | 29% | 6% | - | |
37 | NAYAK Antara | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
38 | DAVIS Jordan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - | |
39 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
40 | RESTREPO URREGO Laura | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
41 | STAFFORD Lillian | 100% | 70% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
42 | LI Alexis | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
43 | KHERA Anya | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
44 | ONG Lauren | 100% | 63% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.